.


회원 언론기고 및 출판





<코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / Changing tripartite relationships among Koreas, U…

페이지 정보

작성일2018-07-24 10:38 조회2,371회 댓글0건

본문

[Park Sang-seek] Changing tripartite relationships among Koreas, US

2018-06-07 17:15

Lately the North Korean nuclear issue has affected the tripartite relationships among the two Koreas and the US: North Korea and the US have become the direct parties for the nuclear negotiations with South Korea as a third party providing good offices or playing the role of a mediator. It is very difficult to understand why the country which will become the primary target of North Korea in case of military conflicts on the Korean Peninsula is not the main party to nuclear negotiations.

Some argue that the reason is too obvious because North Korea has developed its nuclear weapons to use them against the US, not against South Korea and it has already conventional military forces superior or equal to South Korea’s. This reversal of the view of the tripartite relationships has serious implications for the security environment on the Korean Peninsula.

Until North Korea succeeded in developing the nuclear weaponry, South Korea has been the main enemy of North Korea. Now the US has become the main enemy of North Korea. This was exactly the purpose of North Korea’s development of the MDW. This change has important implications for the security environment on the Korean Peninsula.

First of all, North Korea has now become a nuclear state which contends with the most powerful nation and the guardian and main protector of South Korea on the equal basis and does not need South Korea even as an intermediary between North Korea and the US. The forthcoming Kim-Trump summit in Singapore on June 12 demonstrates this reality. South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s all-out efforts to consolidate a rapprochement with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un may not be so attractive and necessary for the latter because Kim is much more interested in dealing with American President Donald Trump than with President Moon. North Korea’s nuclear weaponry plays the role of a magic wand because he can gain more and greater things from Trump than Moon. Therefore, the North Korean leader may not need President Moon as an intermediary.

What he needs right now is to get out of the economic clampdown by the US and the international community under the United Nations Security Council Resolution 2397 (Dec. 23, 2017). The economic sanctions under this resolution are the most comprehensive and strict among all the UN economic sanctions imposed on North Korea and most countries, including China, are adhering to it. More importantly, the US is imposing comprehensive and strict economic sanctions of its own.

Under the circumstances, North Korea has no choice but to seek direct contact with the US and South Korea can play the role of a provider of good offices or of a mediator. But in view of the fact that Kim will meet Trump face to face soon, South Korea’s role is likely to be very limited. I wonder whether the North Korean leader wants to discuss any things related to the US-North Korea relations with the South Korean leader open-mindedly.

Moreover, the US President would prefer to communicate directly with the North Korean leader who would be more than happy to talk directly with him. All the above-mentioned developments reveal that direct talks between North Korea and the US can take place more often. The most important and urgent task for the US President is to denuclearize North Korea. For this purpose he is willing to normalize relations and conclude a peace treaty with North Korea if North Korea abandons its nuclear program completely.

It seems that Kim Jong-un is more interested in North Korea-US talks than inter-Korean talks, mainly because if it normalizes relations with the US, it will become much easier to normalize relations with South Korea and it can gain more from the US than from South Korea. One example is the question of withdrawal of US troops in South Korea. It will be much easier and realistic for North Korea to negotiate with the US than with South Korea on that issue. In this context, it is ironic that President Moon is working very hard to make the forthcoming US-North Korea summit talks successful, because North Korea is most likely to demand a partial, if not a total, withdrawal of the US ground troops from South Korea as one condition of North Korea’s denuclearization at that meeting.

There is no guarantee that the US will reject such a proposal outright. North Korea has already included this demand in the peace treaty it has proposed. Another condition is that the US should guarantee the safety of the Kim regime. The US has already made that pledge. President Moon also has promised that South Korea will never try to overthrow the North Korean regime. As to the second issue the South Korean president is not likely to agree to a partial or total withdrawal of the US troops in the short-term.

Since North Korea has become a de facto nuclear power, it has been trying to deal with the Korean Peninsula security issue almost exclusively with the US rather than South Korea. The US has responded accordingly. Dealing with the US exclusively, North Korea has gained an equal status with the US, making South Korea more subordinate to the US. The more South Korea becomes subservient to the US, the more equal North Korea becomes to the US. Consequently, the tripartite relationship has changed from the triangle of South Korea and the US against North Korea to the triangle of two Koreas and the US. Some conservative observers believe that the tripartite relationship has already become the two Koreas against the US relationship. But this is a too far-fetched view of the present tripartite relationship. If South Korea moves too close to North Korea at the sacrifice of the South Korea-US relationship, it will not only create a serious political turmoil in South Korea but also damage seriously the iron-clad ties between the two allies. No Korean government, conservative or progressive, will dare to go to that extreme.

As the relationship between the two Koreas improves, the tripartite relationship will become more complex and delicate. The only solution to the dilemma is that the South-North Korea relationship should move in tandem with the US-North Korea relationship. In this case, South Korea should carefully watch how the US and North Korea approach each other. The forthcoming Trump-Kim summit will become a testing ground for the dynamics of the tripartite relationships.


By Park Sang-seek

Park Sang-seek is a former chancellor of IFANS (now the National Diplomatic Academy, Foreign Ministry) and the author of Globalized Korea and Localized Globe). -- Ed.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

  Total 447건 1 페이지
회원 언론기고 및 출판 목록
번호 제목
447 (학술공공) 회원 서적 출간 안내 (정규섭 회원)
일자: 11-08 | 조회: 154
2022-11-08
154
446 (학술공공) 회원 서적 출간 안내
일자: 06-13 | 조회: 162
2022-06-13
162
445 [신간] 조갑동 / 푸름 Azul (그린비, 2020.…
일자: 11-18 | 조회: 533
2020-11-18
533
444 [신간] 황길신 / 초원의 말발굽 소리 (고글, 202…
일자: 11-18 | 조회: 457
2020-11-18
457
443 [신간] 이용일 / 분단과 통일의 법 (느린생각, 20…
일자: 11-18 | 조회: 562
2020-11-18
562
442 [신간] 백범흠 / 미·중 신냉전과 한국 (늘품, 20…
일자: 11-12 | 조회: 952
2020-11-12
952
441 <미디어시비비비> 박병환 / 참을 수 없는 대한민국의 …
일자: 11-12 | 조회: 479
2020-11-12
479
440 [신간] 서현섭 / 한중일의 갈림길, 나가사키 (보고사…
일자: 11-06 | 조회: 537
2020-11-06
537
439 [신간] 조윤수 / 독일 통일 30년, 독일의 과거에서…
일자: 11-06 | 조회: 436
2020-11-06
436
438 [신간] 손선홍 / 도시로 떠난 독일 역사 문화 산책 …
일자: 11-03 | 조회: 440
2020-11-03
440
437 <성주신문> 김석규 / 올해의 자랑스러운 성주인상 3명…
일자: 10-26 | 조회: 501
2020-10-26
501
436 [신간] 조윤수 / 대사와 함께 떠나는 소아시아 역사문…
일자: 10-26 | 조회: 651
2020-10-26
651
435 <미디어시비비비> 박병환 / 한국인의 대일본 및 중국 …
일자: 10-15 | 조회: 593
2020-10-15
593
434 <세계일보> 이준규 / 외교부, 전문가 집단으로 자존심…
일자: 10-14 | 조회: 512
2020-10-14
512
433 <서울문화투데이> 이함준 / 한국 문화예술의 세계화를 …
일자: 09-18 | 조회: 572
2020-09-18
572
432 [신간] 송금영 / 아프리카 깊이 읽기 (민속원, 20…
일자: 09-16 | 조회: 549
2020-09-16
549
431 <미디어 시시비비> 박병환 / 미중 갈등 악화 가능성과…
일자: 09-15 | 조회: 739
2020-09-15
739
430 <내일신문> 박병환 / 벨라루스 사태, 또 하나의 색깔…
일자: 09-15 | 조회: 717
2020-09-15
717
429 [신간] 김병호 외 / 공공외교의 이해 (명인문화사, …
일자: 09-11 | 조회: 651
2020-09-11
651
428 <중앙일보> 연상모 / 강경 일변도 시진핑 외교, 마오…
일자: 09-11 | 조회: 698
2020-09-11
698
427 <한국일보> 한병길 / 우리가 페로니즘에서 얻어야 할 …
일자: 09-04 | 조회: 984
2020-09-04
984
426 <서울문화투데이 문화대상(글로벌) 수상자 인터뷰> 이함…
일자: 08-21 | 조회: 613
2020-08-21
613
425 <천지일보> 박병환 / 덩샤오핑이 살아있다면 시진핑에게…
일자: 08-18 | 조회: 586
2020-08-18
586
424 <내일신문> 박병환 / G7개편 구상과 러시아, 그리고…
일자: 08-12 | 조회: 515
2020-08-12
515
423 <천지일보> 박병환 / 에너지 시장의 파워게임과 한-러…
일자: 08-07 | 조회: 573
2020-08-07
573
422 <천지일보> 박병환 / 일본 기업 징용 배상 판결 이행…
일자: 07-29 | 조회: 544
2020-07-29
544
421 [신간] 전봉근 / 비핵화의 정치 리플렛 (명인문화사,…
일자: 07-22 | 조회: 783
2020-07-22
783
420 [신간] 이백순 / 대변환 시대의 한국 외교 (21세기…
일자: 07-15 | 조회: 802
2020-07-15
802
419 <중앙일보> 임한택 / 대법원 강제징용 판결의 현금화 …
일자: 07-14 | 조회: 782
2020-07-14
782
418 [신간] 황순택 / 서양명화 읽어주는 외교관 (모노폴리…
일자: 07-10 | 조회: 1000
2020-07-10
1000
게시물 검색







한국외교협회 | 개인정보 보호관리자: 박경훈
E-mail: kcfr@hanmail.net

주소: 서울시 서초구 남부순환로 294길 33
TEL: 02-2186-3600 | FAX: 02-585-6204

Copyright(c) 한국외교협회 All Rights Reserved.
hosting by 1004pr