.


회원 언론기고 및 출판





<코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / South Korea-US alliance should be re-examined

페이지 정보

작성일2018-06-04 16:05 조회668회 댓글0건

본문

[Park Sang-seek] South Korea-US alliance should be re-examined

2017-05-11 17:37

 

 

On April 27, President Donald Trump said that South Korea should pay for the cost of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense anti-missile system and that he intends to renegotiate or terminate the US-South Korea free trade agreement.

A few days later he said that he would be honored to meet Kim Jong-un, praising him as a man who is quite smart. Trump may continue to demand that South Korea share more burden militarily and economically. His North Korea policy may also confuse all parties directly involved in the Korean conflict.

In light of such factors, South Koreans are confused and disappointed. They wonder whether the US will remain their most trusted ally and whether South Korea should review its security structure that it has maintained since the Korean War. Now is the time to review the 64-year-old South Korea-US alliance.

First, the ROK-US alliance is a mutual defense system in which South Korea and the US are responsible for defending each other in contrast with the US-Japan alliance, in which the US is unilaterally responsible for defending Japan. Therefore, the US can ask South Korean forces to come to the aid of US troops.

Second, unlike the NATO treaty the South Korea-US treaty has no clause of automatic involvement in defense of each other and requires the approval of the legislative body of each party. Therefore, the US can refuse to participate in a conflict in Korea.

Third, Korean troops are not required to be stationed in US territory while US troops are entitled to be stationed in Korea. Therefore, it would be much more difficult for South Korea to order American troops to leave South Korea than for the US to withdraw its troops from South Korea, unless the mutual defense treaty is amended.

The US can use all these provisions as leverage if it wants to request that South Korea make more financial contributions for the US troops and military installations in Korea, or revise the alliance treaty and the status of forces agreement.

The best way to handle these situations is to build a self-sufficient military force which all the previous Korean governments have pledged but neglected or failed to do. A self-sufficient military force is a military force that can defeat the North Korean forces without the support of US conventional forces.

At the same time, the Combined Forces Command and the war-time operational control by the US commander should be abolished. This self-sufficient force should also be equipped with its own independent missile defense capabilities against North Korea’s nuclear forces while the US provides a nuclear umbrella because North Korea has anti-ballistic missiles as well as nuclear weaponry and ballistic missile systems.

Furthermore, a more serious issue between the US and South Korea is anti-Americanism in South Korea and anti-South Korean sentiment in the US.

Public opinion in South Korea on US-South Korean relations has changed from predominantly pro-American to less pro-American. Until the military dictatorships in the South were over in 1993, the sources of anti-Americanism had been America’s support or neutral attitude toward military dictatorships and American soldiers’ misbehavior. During the period of military dictatorships, the youth, particularly college students, became anti-American and condemned US imperialism, using the usual communist rhetoric. But an absolute majority of South Koreans, except the extreme leftists and pro-North Koreans, have remained pro-American.

As South Korea has surpassed North Korea economically, South Korea’s military forces have become more and more self-sufficient and have been seeking complete independence from the US-ROK Combined Forces Command.

However, the general public still supports the alliance. Around 35 percent of people surveyed in 2005, during the Roh Moo-hyun liberal government, and 42.9 percent of them in 2015, during the Park Geun-hye conservative government, favored a “further” strengthening of the alliance.

An overwhelming majority of South Koreans (70.4 percent in March 2016) believes that the US is more important for South Korean national security than China (21.0 percent), Russia (1.6 percent) and Japan (0.9 percent).

Americans also support the American military bases in South Korea, with 64 percent of them saying so in a survey in 2014. Close to half of them support the US troops defending South Korea, with 47 percent of them saying so in a survey in 2015.

As mentioned above, the US Congress has the power to declare war. Therefore, the Congress is less likely to support US participation in another Korean conflict if an absolute majority of the people objects to the US participation.

More important is the rationale for the necessity of the South Korea-US alliance for South Korea and the US.

Since the South-North Korea non-aggression agreement in 1992, North Korea has constantly called for a US-North Korea peace treaty. After the North Korean nuclear program became a key issue between North Korea and the US, North Korea has continuously demanded the US-North Korea peace treaty as in return for the denuclearization of North Korea.

Its objective is to undermine, if not to destroy, the US-South Korea alliance. But it could be acceptable to the US and South Korea on the conditions that North Korea ends its nuclear and missile programs and the US-South Korea alliance is slightly revised, while North Korea maintains the China-North Korea alliance.

Under a revised US-South Korea alliance, the US should not maintain ground troops and any kind of anti-ballistic missile system in South Korea.

Both the US and South Korea could benefit from a revised alliance. They could use the southern triangle (the US-Japan-South Korea coalition) against the northern triangle (the China-Russia-North Korea coalition). Both would be able contain China’s domination of Northeast Asia. As long as China supports North Korea, they cannot but check China.

Additionally, the US could use South Korea to demonstrate its global leadership in democracy and the reliability of its alliance commitments.

The first things the new president should do are to denuclearize North Korea and restructure the Korean-American alliance.


By Park Sang-seek

Park Sang-seek is a former rector, the Graduate Institute of Peace Studies, Kyung Hee University. -- Ed.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

  Total 447건 5 페이지
회원 언론기고 및 출판 목록
번호 제목
327 <경향신문> 정기종 / 한국은 ‘홀로서기’를 할 준비가…
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 874
2018-06-04
874
326 <통일한국> 손선홍 / 통일과정의 논쟁점에 대비하고 있…
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 689
2018-06-04
689
325 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / Three threats t…
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 874
2018-06-04
874
324 <서울신문> 이병국 / 엉터리 계획서 쓴 ‘콜럼버스 공…
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 796
2018-06-04
796
323 <매일경제> 손선홍 / 콜 前총리가 `獨통일의 아버지`…
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 691
2018-06-04
691
322 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / North Korea and…
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 713
2018-06-04
713
열람중 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / South Korea-US …
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 669
2018-06-04
669
320 <조이문학> 이경구 / 북소리...
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 827
2018-06-04
827
319 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / The two Koreas …
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 603
2018-06-04
603
318 <세계일보> 한태규 / 세계초대석 인터뷰
일자: 05-30 | 조회: 1159
2018-05-30
1159
317 <매일경제> 손선홍 / 북한을 어떻게 변화시킬 것인가
일자: 05-30 | 조회: 724
2018-05-30
724
316 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / Korea’s nationa…
일자: 05-30 | 조회: 886
2018-05-30
886
315 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / How to deal wit…
일자: 05-30 | 조회: 1083
2018-05-30
1083
314 <대전일보> 김현중 / 한류 위기 ... 제2의 싸이가…
일자: 05-30 | 조회: 1163
2018-05-30
1163
313 <통일신문> 정태익 / 안보위기를 통일의 기회로…
일자: 10-19 | 조회: 1352
2016-10-19
1352
312 <문화일보> 송종환 / 파키스탄의 ‘인더스강 기…
일자: 11-09 | 조회: 2290
2015-11-09
2290
311 <조선일보> 정태익 / 톨스토이, 이토 히로…
일자: 12-08 | 조회: 4155
2014-12-08
4155
310 <조선일보> 정태익 / 사라진 헤이그 밀사의 후…
일자: 12-08 | 조회: 3544
2014-12-08
3544
309 <중앙일보> 송민순 / 전시작전권 전환은 통일과…
일자: 11-13 | 조회: 2851
2014-11-13
2851
308 <mk 뉴스> 임홍재 / 저탄소 지구를 향한 유…
일자: 09-23 | 조회: 1975
2014-09-23
1975
307 <조선일보> 정태익 / 사라진 헤이그 밀사 후손…
일자: 08-18 | 조회: 3906
2014-08-18
3906
306 <조선일보> 정태익 / 고르바초프 라이사를 잃…
일자: 05-20 | 조회: 4029
2014-05-20
4029
305 <조선일보> 정태익 / 장쩌민, 來而不往 非…
일자: 04-10 | 조회: 3898
2014-04-10
3898
304 <조선일보> 정태익 / 텍사스 출신 부시, …
일자: 03-03 | 조회: 2988
2014-03-03
2988
303 <조선일보> 정태익 / 청와대 출근 첫날 자정 …
일자: 03-03 | 조회: 3305
2014-03-03
3305
302 <조선일보> 정태익 / 유성환의원 발언으로 미국…
일자: 12-30 | 조회: 3608
2013-12-30
3608
301 <조선일보> 정태익 / 1994년 가을 대사관저…
일자: 11-27 | 조회: 1222
2013-11-27
1222
300 <조선일보> 정태익 / 한국-이집트 극적인 수교…
일자: 11-27 | 조회: 1320
2013-11-27
1320
299 <광화문 포럼> 정태익 / 한반도 정세의 대전환…
일자: 11-27 | 조회: 1368
2013-11-27
1368
298 <한국?파키스탄 친선협회> 오재희 / 한국?파키…
일자: 11-22 | 조회: 1778
2013-11-22
1778
게시물 검색







한국외교협회 | 개인정보 보호관리자: 박경훈
E-mail: kcfr@hanmail.net

주소: 서울시 서초구 남부순환로 294길 33
TEL: 02-2186-3600 | FAX: 02-585-6204

Copyright(c) 한국외교협회 All Rights Reserved.
hosting by 1004pr