.


회원 언론기고 및 출판





<코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / How to deal with the North Korean nuclear threat?

페이지 정보

작성일2018-05-30 17:03 조회1,092회 댓글0건

본문

[Park Sang-seek] How to deal with the North Korean nuclear threat?

2016-10-19 15:08

Since North Korea conducted its fifth nuclear test on Oct. 9 this year, both South Korean and US governments, political leaders, scholars, research organizations and mass media have put forward their solutions to the issue. They can be classified into two categories: solutions through negotiations and solutions through confrontational actions.

Those who believe that the North Korean leadership is suffering from a siege mentality advocate solutions through negotiations. They suggest five types of negotiating formats: the US-North Korea bilateral talks; the US-South and North Korea trilateral talks; the US-South and North Korea-China quadrilateral talks; and the six-party talks.

They propose five topics as the subjects of negotiations: the abolition of the North Korean nuclear programs and the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula; a peace treaty replacing the existing armistice agreement; the end of the US-South Korea mutual defense treaty and the China-North Korea mutual assistance treaty; the establishment of diplomatic relationships between the US and North Korea and between Japan and North Korea; and the disarmament and arms control of both Koreas’ armed forces. Some suggest the first topic; others the second topic or both second and third topics; and still others all five topics.

As to the denuclearization of North Korea, the US government still prefers the six-party talks. But China, South and North Korea may prefer a different format, depending on the subjects of the negotiations. Many opinion-makers suggest the North Korea-US bilateral talks or the quadrilateral talks of the two Koreas, the US and China. Concerning a peace treaty to replace the existing armistice agreement, the US proposes a US-North Korea bilateral negotiation, but South and North Korea have not made any official statement on the subject, although North Korea has rejected the US-North Korea bilateral talks only for the discussion of the denuclearization issue.

The multilateral talks can take either a four-party format which includes the main actors in the Korean War (the two Koreas and the US and China) or a six-party format which includes the six countries in Northeast Asia. Whether these multi-party talks take a quadrilateral or hexagonal format, this peace maintenance structure will have to turn into a regional collective security system (or a concert of powers system). To establish this system, all the five topics mentioned above should be discussed and resolved.

The South Korean and US governments, some political leaders, scholars, research organizations and mass media advocate confrontational actions, condemning the conciliatory approaches.

One approach promoted by the US and South Korean governments and supported by many conservative scholars, mass media and research organizations holds that in resorting to all kinds of maneuvers and provocations, North Korea has rejected and ignored all the conciliatory offers by the US and South Korea and has continued its nuclear development and perfected its nuclear capabilities. Now, the only alternative left to the US and South Korea is that the two allies, together with the UN, impose complete economic and financial sanctions on North Korea, while urging UN member states to downgrade their diplomatic relations with North Korea and to expel it from international organizations. They particularly demand China, which is the main supporter of North Korea, to fully execute the economic sanctions required by the UNSC resolutions and put pressure on North Korea to abandon its nuclear program. Meanwhile, the two allies should maintain various kinds of military measures including preparations for a preemptive attack.

On the other hand, the US and South Korea should jointly guarantee China and North Korea that the US forces would never resort to pre-emptive attacks against North Korea unless it is clear the latter is about to launch a nuclear attack. They should also assure China the US would never station its troops in North Korea even in such a case the US-South Korean forces occupy North Korea.

Another proposal supported by some moderates is that the US-North Korea bilateral talks or the six-party talks can be reopened to discuss the complete denuclearization of North Korea together with the complete denuclearization of South Korea, and a non-aggression treaty between the US and North Korea guaranteed by the other concerned parties, accompanied by economic aid, the normalization of diplomatic relations between North Korea and the US and between North Korea and Japan, and assistance to North Korea’s participation in the international economic and financial organizations.

Which approach is appropriate, negotiation or confrontation?  Unless we have the accurate intelligence on the nature of the North Korean leadership and the true motive of its nuclear ambition, it will be impossible to choose the best strategy toward North Korea’s nuclear threat. In concrete terms, the correct intelligence on the following questions should be secured.

First, is Kim Jong-un in firm control of the North Korean elites?  Second, is what the North Korean regime says about the purpose and degree of development of its nuclear program actually true or a bluff or faint motion?  Third, are the quid pro quos for the dismantlement of its nuclear program demanded by North Korea such as a peace treaty between the US and North Korea, a Korean Peninsula peace regime, the end of the South Korea-US alliance and a disarmament and arms control treaty between the two Koreas a mere camouflage or its ultimate aim to communize South Korea?

Finally, do the US and South Korean authorities have accurate intelligence on the exact locations of Kim Jong-un and his Praetorian Guard, nuclear weapons and launching apparatus?

By Park Sang-seek

Park Sang-seek is a former rector of the Graduate Institute of Peace Studies at Kyung Hee University and the author of “Globalized Korea and Localized Globe.” He can be reached at parksangseek@hotmail.com. ― Ed.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

  Total 447건 6 페이지
회원 언론기고 및 출판 목록
번호 제목
297 <광화문 문화포럼> 정태익 / 동북아 국제질서 …
일자: 11-21 | 조회: 1160
2013-11-21
1160
296 <중도일보> 김현중 / '정글만리' 견문록
일자: 11-05 | 조회: 2119
2013-11-05
2119
295 <동아일보> 이병국 / 前대사 34명이 ‘개도국…
일자: 11-05 | 조회: 2033
2013-11-05
2033
294 <조선일보> 강대현 / 사모아에 묻힌 원양 선원…
일자: 11-05 | 조회: 1738
2013-11-05
1738
293 <국민일보> 김석우 / 한국사회 봉사정신 누가 …
일자: 11-05 | 조회: 1252
2013-11-05
1252
292 <대전일보> 김현중 / 재외동포는 귀중한 <…
일자: 11-05 | 조회: 1514
2013-11-05
1514
291 <매일경제> 백낙환 / 한-베트남 이젠 新동반자…
일자: 11-05 | 조회: 1998
2013-11-05
1998
290 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / Two differe…
일자: 11-05 | 조회: 1487
2013-11-05
1487
289 <인민일보> 박종선 / 중국경제 편승할 대중국 …
일자: 11-05 | 조회: 1890
2013-11-05
1890
288 <월간바둑> 서대원 / 인천에서 바둑 메달 경쟁…
일자: 11-05 | 조회: 1394
2013-11-05
1394
287 <중앙일보> 유주열 / [백가쟁명:유주열] 또 …
일자: 09-12 | 조회: 1554
2013-09-12
1554
286 <외교열전> 유광석 / 세계에서 처음으로…한미 …
일자: 08-29 | 조회: 2332
2013-08-29
2332
285 <MBN> 전상진 / 올림픽유치와 외교부의 역할
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 1524
2013-08-16
1524
284 <외교열전> 김태지 / '日침략사죄' 무라야마 …
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 2347
2013-08-16
2347
283 <외교열전> 최봉름 / 이라크서 맞은 두번의 전…
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 1603
2013-08-16
1603
282 <외교열전> 박인국 / 긴박했던 '천안함·연평도…
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 2662
2013-08-16
2662
281 <외교열전> 장재룡 / 北 오래 못간다 보고 …
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 2280
2013-08-16
2280
280 <외교열전> 신동원 / '북방외교 시초' 한ㆍ헝…
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 1520
2013-08-16
1520
279 <외교열전> 유병우 / `위안부 강제동원 인정'…
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 2570
2013-08-16
2570
278 <외교열전> 황장엽을 한국으로 한중협상 `막…
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 1417
2013-08-16
1417
277 <INEPA> 포르투갈 정부 강대현 국제교류증진…
일자: 01-21 | 조회: 2071
2013-01-21
2071
276 <외교열전> 일사천리'로 탄생한 남북 첫 유엔공…
일자: 11-30 | 조회: 1943
2012-11-30
1943
275 <외교열전> JFK가 박정희 방일 요구했다 /…
일자: 11-30 | 조회: 1724
2012-11-30
1724
274 <외교열전> 불법조업 막아라
일자: 10-30 | 조회: 2060
2012-10-30
2060
273 <국민일보> 시론-대선 후보들 외교전략 밝혀라 …
일자: 09-26 | 조회: 2047
2012-09-26
2047
272 <문화일보> 외교史전시관 설립 결심 / 권영민
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 2164
2012-08-16
2164
271 등산을 하면 행복해질 수 있습니다. / 최용삼
일자: 07-12 | 조회: 1469
2012-07-12
1469
270 <중앙일보> 콘도르가 된 8인의 영웅 / 박희권…
일자: 06-26 | 조회: 1772
2012-06-26
1772
269 <중앙일보> 동해를 부르는 ‘제3의 명칭’ / …
일자: 03-28 | 조회: 1573
2012-03-28
1573
268 <뉴데일리> 통상교섭본부에 박수 보낸다 / 이재…
일자: 03-21 | 조회: 1811
2012-03-21
1811
게시물 검색







한국외교협회 | 개인정보 보호관리자: 박경훈
E-mail: kcfr@hanmail.net

주소: 서울시 서초구 남부순환로 294길 33
TEL: 02-2186-3600 | FAX: 02-585-6204

Copyright(c) 한국외교협회 All Rights Reserved.
hosting by 1004pr