.


회원 언론기고 및 출판





<코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / How to deal with the North Korean nuclear threat?

페이지 정보

작성일2018-05-30 17:03 조회3,098회 댓글0건

본문

[Park Sang-seek] How to deal with the North Korean nuclear threat?

2016-10-19 15:08

Since North Korea conducted its fifth nuclear test on Oct. 9 this year, both South Korean and US governments, political leaders, scholars, research organizations and mass media have put forward their solutions to the issue. They can be classified into two categories: solutions through negotiations and solutions through confrontational actions.

Those who believe that the North Korean leadership is suffering from a siege mentality advocate solutions through negotiations. They suggest five types of negotiating formats: the US-North Korea bilateral talks; the US-South and North Korea trilateral talks; the US-South and North Korea-China quadrilateral talks; and the six-party talks.

They propose five topics as the subjects of negotiations: the abolition of the North Korean nuclear programs and the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula; a peace treaty replacing the existing armistice agreement; the end of the US-South Korea mutual defense treaty and the China-North Korea mutual assistance treaty; the establishment of diplomatic relationships between the US and North Korea and between Japan and North Korea; and the disarmament and arms control of both Koreas’ armed forces. Some suggest the first topic; others the second topic or both second and third topics; and still others all five topics.

As to the denuclearization of North Korea, the US government still prefers the six-party talks. But China, South and North Korea may prefer a different format, depending on the subjects of the negotiations. Many opinion-makers suggest the North Korea-US bilateral talks or the quadrilateral talks of the two Koreas, the US and China. Concerning a peace treaty to replace the existing armistice agreement, the US proposes a US-North Korea bilateral negotiation, but South and North Korea have not made any official statement on the subject, although North Korea has rejected the US-North Korea bilateral talks only for the discussion of the denuclearization issue.

The multilateral talks can take either a four-party format which includes the main actors in the Korean War (the two Koreas and the US and China) or a six-party format which includes the six countries in Northeast Asia. Whether these multi-party talks take a quadrilateral or hexagonal format, this peace maintenance structure will have to turn into a regional collective security system (or a concert of powers system). To establish this system, all the five topics mentioned above should be discussed and resolved.

The South Korean and US governments, some political leaders, scholars, research organizations and mass media advocate confrontational actions, condemning the conciliatory approaches.

One approach promoted by the US and South Korean governments and supported by many conservative scholars, mass media and research organizations holds that in resorting to all kinds of maneuvers and provocations, North Korea has rejected and ignored all the conciliatory offers by the US and South Korea and has continued its nuclear development and perfected its nuclear capabilities. Now, the only alternative left to the US and South Korea is that the two allies, together with the UN, impose complete economic and financial sanctions on North Korea, while urging UN member states to downgrade their diplomatic relations with North Korea and to expel it from international organizations. They particularly demand China, which is the main supporter of North Korea, to fully execute the economic sanctions required by the UNSC resolutions and put pressure on North Korea to abandon its nuclear program. Meanwhile, the two allies should maintain various kinds of military measures including preparations for a preemptive attack.

On the other hand, the US and South Korea should jointly guarantee China and North Korea that the US forces would never resort to pre-emptive attacks against North Korea unless it is clear the latter is about to launch a nuclear attack. They should also assure China the US would never station its troops in North Korea even in such a case the US-South Korean forces occupy North Korea.

Another proposal supported by some moderates is that the US-North Korea bilateral talks or the six-party talks can be reopened to discuss the complete denuclearization of North Korea together with the complete denuclearization of South Korea, and a non-aggression treaty between the US and North Korea guaranteed by the other concerned parties, accompanied by economic aid, the normalization of diplomatic relations between North Korea and the US and between North Korea and Japan, and assistance to North Korea’s participation in the international economic and financial organizations.

Which approach is appropriate, negotiation or confrontation?  Unless we have the accurate intelligence on the nature of the North Korean leadership and the true motive of its nuclear ambition, it will be impossible to choose the best strategy toward North Korea’s nuclear threat. In concrete terms, the correct intelligence on the following questions should be secured.

First, is Kim Jong-un in firm control of the North Korean elites?  Second, is what the North Korean regime says about the purpose and degree of development of its nuclear program actually true or a bluff or faint motion?  Third, are the quid pro quos for the dismantlement of its nuclear program demanded by North Korea such as a peace treaty between the US and North Korea, a Korean Peninsula peace regime, the end of the South Korea-US alliance and a disarmament and arms control treaty between the two Koreas a mere camouflage or its ultimate aim to communize South Korea?

Finally, do the US and South Korean authorities have accurate intelligence on the exact locations of Kim Jong-un and his Praetorian Guard, nuclear weapons and launching apparatus?

By Park Sang-seek

Park Sang-seek is a former rector of the Graduate Institute of Peace Studies at Kyung Hee University and the author of “Globalized Korea and Localized Globe.” He can be reached at parksangseek@hotmail.com. ― Ed.


Warning: Use of undefined constant php - assumed 'php' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home1/page87/public_html/kcfr20/skin/board/basic_book/view.skin.php on line 184

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

  Total 447건 4 페이지
회원 언론기고 및 출판 목록
번호 제목
357 [신간] 이용준 / 북핵 30년의 허상과 진실 (한울,…
일자: 01-31 | 조회: 884
2019-01-31
884
356 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / Transformation …
일자: 01-31 | 조회: 972
2019-01-31
972
355 [신간] 고창수 / 말이 꾸는 꿈 (리토피아, 2018…
일자: 01-31 | 조회: 623
2019-01-31
623
354 <내일신문> 이선진 / 갈림길에 서있는 한국외교
일자: 01-18 | 조회: 526
2019-01-18
526
353 <미래한국> 송종환 / 미국 동포들, 비핵화·모국의 안…
일자: 01-16 | 조회: 691
2019-01-16
691
352 <내일신문> 이선진 / 미국 ‘인도·태평양 전략’과 중…
일자: 12-17 | 조회: 744
2018-12-17
744
351 <내일신문> 이선진 / 마하티르 총리의 재기를 주목하라
일자: 11-19 | 조회: 1157
2018-11-19
1157
350 <내일신문> 이선진 / 동북3성에서도 뻗어가는 중국 힘…
일자: 09-17 | 조회: 1754
2018-09-17
1754
349 <미래한국> 송종환 / 박정희 대통령의 ‘8․15 평화…
일자: 08-30 | 조회: 2498
2018-08-30
2498
348 <미래한국> 송종환 / 우리가 요구해야 할 종전선언과 …
일자: 08-30 | 조회: 1764
2018-08-30
1764
347 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / Changing tripar…
일자: 07-24 | 조회: 2489
2018-07-24
2489
346 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / Peace regime an…
일자: 07-24 | 조회: 2131
2018-07-24
2131
345 <내일신문> 이선진 / 북미협상에만 매달릴 것인가
일자: 07-16 | 조회: 1988
2018-07-16
1988
344 <농촌여성신문> 한태규 / 한·미·북 3자회담이 한반도…
일자: 07-04 | 조회: 2468
2018-07-04
2468
343 <내일신문> 이선진 / 파격에 희망을 건다
일자: 06-25 | 조회: 2834
2018-06-25
2834
342 <문화일보> 송종환 / 대화로 북한 핵 폐기할 마지막 …
일자: 06-05 | 조회: 2853
2018-06-05
2853
341 <조선일보> 송종환 / 北, 핵폐기 아닌 보유국 선언.…
일자: 06-05 | 조회: 2560
2018-06-05
2560
340 <세계일보> 이호진 / 트럼프의 덫… 김정은 핵포기만 …
일자: 06-05 | 조회: 2298
2018-06-05
2298
339 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / Agenda items fo…
일자: 06-05 | 조회: 1687
2018-06-05
1687
338 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / Why has North K…
일자: 06-05 | 조회: 1264
2018-06-05
1264
337 <국민일보> 최영진 / 북한 내부가 문제다
일자: 06-05 | 조회: 945
2018-06-05
945
336 <동아일보> 천영우 / 북한 김정은, 이성적 지도자인가
일자: 06-05 | 조회: 843
2018-06-05
843
335 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / North Korea’s n…
일자: 06-05 | 조회: 948
2018-06-05
948
334 <미래한국> 송종환 / 北 선전 공세에 낚인 南정부
일자: 06-05 | 조회: 843
2018-06-05
843
333 <동아일보> 천영우 / 트럼프 공언이 ‘코리아 패싱’ …
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 867
2018-06-04
867
332 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / President Moon’…
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 984
2018-06-04
984
331 <코리아헤럴드> 송종환 / Misunderstandin…
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 1054
2018-06-04
1054
330 <코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / War of words be…
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 1029
2018-06-04
1029
329 <조선일보> 박상기 / '미국 우선주의' 통상 압박, …
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 944
2018-06-04
944
328 <자유칼럼> 정달호 / 시몬 베이유 여사의 검소한 장례
일자: 06-04 | 조회: 943
2018-06-04
943
게시물 검색







한국외교협회 | 개인정보 보호관리자: 박경훈
E-mail: kcfr@hanmail.net

주소: 서울시 서초구 남부순환로 294길 33
TEL: 02-2186-3600 | FAX: 02-585-6204

Copyright(c) 한국외교협회 All Rights Reserved.
hosting by 1004pr